Call Out The Ingstigator, Because There’s Something in the Air at West Ham

Graham Potter opened his Premier League account with a battling victory over Fulham on Tuesday night. Saturday provides an opportunity to make it two in a row with the visit of Crystal Palace.

And Graham said: “Let there be light (at the end of the tunnel)”. And lo, the light divided the darkness shrouding the London Stadium since last August. And the supporters saw the light and said it was good – considering the current injury situation. And the people rejoiced: “We can see clearly now the (man from) Spain has gone.”

The Graham Potter Premier League era got off to an ideal winning start on Tuesday evening as they overcame Fulham by three goals to two in the nostalgic 7:30 pm kick-off. It wasn’t a vintage performance by any means, but there was no faulting the effort, endeavour or commitment of the players. Not something that could be said about most of the season that had gone before.

As fans we have a right to expect the players to give 100% effort in every game (equivalent to 110% in pundit language). We might have other opinions about them – too old, too slow, not technically good enough at this level, exorbitant transfer fee, wages too high – but these are factors of poor recruitment or selection rather than of their own making. Bad attitude and lack of effort, on the other hand, are unacceptable. Where it becomes difficult is determning the line between individual player effort and deficiencies caused by the inadequacies or vagaries of coaching pigheadedness. Edson Alvarez is a perfect example. Many considered him to be excellent against Fulham while a few weeks earlier he had been ridiculed as an abysmal footballer. Which is true? He had reportedly fallen out with Lopetegui and was routinely set up as the scapegoat for the coach’s baffling defensive tactics. Can we blame a player for not performing in a role they are unsuited for?

I never believed Alvarez ever gave up trying, but his lack of pace was magnified by the role he was given to perform. The same could be said of Danny Ings, who with the best will in the world was never likley to be a like for like replacement for Michail Antonio, someone capable of ploughing a lonely furrow up front. Hopefully, square pegs and round holes are a thing of the past under Potter’s more thoughtful and considered tutelage.

The new coach had hinted towards creativity to fill the gaps created by injuries to Antonio, Niclas Fullkrug, Jarrod Bowen, and Crysencio Summerville. He did this by pushing Lucas Paqueta forward to ‘lead’ the attack, playing Tomas Soucek as a Number 10 and shifting Carlos Soler out wide on the left. He was not let down with all three registering on the scoresheet. Soler and Paqueta executing their finishes expertly, while Soucek’s fifth strike of the season was one of those excellent team goals that never fail to impress.

Although I do have reservations about Soucek in possession, his commitment to the cause is second to none. And all the while he is scoring, the goals are able to compensate for other shortcomings. The more advanced role suits him, as it did in his first season at West Ham. He is a box-and-box midfielder rather than a box-to-box variety. Someone really should bottle the excitement shown in his post-match interview.

It was a pleasant change for West Ham to score as the result of errors forced from a high press. Alvarez harassing Pereira into making a suicidal blind pass across the area for the first, and Ings punishing Leno for dwelling on the ball for the third. I’ve yet to be convinced that playing out from the keeper is worth all the potential grief associated with it. No doubt the visitors were following team orders but unless you have a keeper specifically recruited for his ball-playing skills it comes with huge risks attached.

Still, it gave Marco Silva something to moan about. Silva is an excellent coach who has done a great job at Fulham and, to be fair, his team did boss most of the game. It is not the first time they have been unlucky to come away from the London Stadium empty handed, but he always finds something to complain about when they lose, doesn’t he? And it’s Hey Ho, Silva Whining.

True to form, the Hammers conceded their regulation couple of goals as two hopeful crosses from Iwobi found their way into the back of net. For me, both were goalkeeping errors by Lukasz Fabianski although the coach might want to consider of the positioning of the centre backs and the wisdom of inviting rather than preventing crosses from coming in. During the low block years, full backs were played narrow to limit the space opponents could exploit in the box. The theory being that crosses can easily be defended by towering centre backs and that crossing has become an inefficient tactic in the modern statistically driven game. Something for Potter to revisit, perhaps, given the attributes of existing personnel.    

In contrast to the sunnier outlook on the pitch, threatening storm clouds in the baordroom suggest that David Sullivan has taken back control of transfer business. Whether this is a) true or b) makes any material difference to what transpired in the summer is anyone’s guess. Worst case is an open season for every reject, drifter, has-been, and loser (and his agent) who calls himself a striker to add their name to the list of 50+ duds who have been signed in the past.

Even if there are pertinent questions to answer on last summer’s transfer dealings – was too much of the budget spent on Killman, how much have we really paid for Luis Guilhereme and was he expected to play a role this season, should we have been aware that spare parts for Fullkrug were no longer available – is the return to a system that delivered 15 years of flops and failure with no resale value the logical alternative? I’ve no strong attachment to Tim Steidten as an individual but surely a professional recruiter is the preferable choice to a chairman too easily seduced by shiny objects.

The dilemma in the transfer window is how much sense it makes investing in the squad now – in the hope of picking up an extra place or two in league position – against a more thorough overhaul in the summer. There is no obvious urgency to make quick fixes unless they are short-term loans or genuine long-term targets. As ever, the best advice is to treat all the transfer speculation you read as an entertaining work of fiction.

The Hammers return to action on Saturday when they entertain Crystal Palace at the London Stadium. It is a fixture they haven’t won since December 2018 when Manuel Pellegrini’s side won 3-2 (Snodgrass, Hernandez and Anderson.) Palace have recovered from a poor start to the season to sit 5th in the current form table (last 6 games) and just two points behind West Ham in the table.

Prior to the Fulham game, Potter said that if he had to choose, he would prioritise points above performance. The same will likely apply here in the absence of key individuals. As long as the direction of travel is consistent – playing higher up the pitch and getting more bodies into the box – then that is good enough for now. I hope we continue to see good use of the squad with the opportunity to see more from Ollie Scarles and Andy Irving or even Guilherme and Lewis Orford.

We’ve got to get together sooner or later. Because the revolution’s here. COYI!

12 thoughts on “Call Out The Ingstigator, Because There’s Something in the Air at West Ham”

  1. Geoff, Interesting and accurate summerisation as usual. Just incredible how the players have responded in the space of one week and surely confirms to everyone interested in WH what has occurred this season up to Potter’s reign. Long may it last and it would be great if we have secured a long term manager with ambition. It would also be great if Potter can influence Sullivan into buying a cf that he wants rather than as you say one more of Sully’s follies. Hereme is a bit of a mystery really, after all of Steidten’s hype, to really not figure at all. If we can get most of our money back i am sure we could put to better use unless Potter thinks he can get him to start producing something fairly quickly. I must confess i was a Steidten supporter in the summer but on reflection he was put into a difficult position with so many additions and although he was blamed for not getting the Villa deal that has all the hallmarks of Sully not signing the cheque to me. Regards Michael

    Like

    1. Hi Michael, I’ve just watched the Graham Potter press conference prior to Saturday’s game and it is so refreshing to have a manager that you can understand and who isn’t hiding behind excuses. Manager’s never give anything meaningful away at these events but they are at least enjoyable. I’m leaning towards the view that very little or nothing will happen at West Ham during this transfer window. It will be more a case of Potter attempting to use players in different ways to see if they have any future at the club. I would like to think that this would also include getting a better look at Guilherme. Geoff

      Like

      1. Hi Geoff, yes a great start I think and long may it continue. I seem to recall that you had some doubts (or was it Richard) about his ‘possession’ football when we were discussing managers some time ago but almost anything will do after Lope, and with luck on our side Potter’ s first two games have been eye opening. Hopefully we can afford a decent cf this month, take nothing for granted though. Better one good rather than 2 or 3 average across the team. Regards Michael

        Like

      2. Mea culpa Michael. I described his Brighton side as “all sizzle and no sausage” and there were also naysayers at Brighton who claimed his side simply didn’t score enough goals. That, of course, could be down to circumstances/ not having the right players. Anyway that’s all in the past and you know we only look forward here ——->

        Like

  2. Thanks for another entertaining read Geoff. Michael touched on the matter of who signed who, and it seems to be part of the circus that keeps everyone guessing via strategic leaks. TS can be made responsible for what doesn’t work out. But it’s no secret that TS was in hot pursuit of Duran, who even got into trouble at Villa for that crossed arms photo. He wasn’t backed financially, and now the Duran price has risen steeply. The board, it was leaked, is disappointed with the business done last summer, though they MUST have approved it. Guilherme was a very promising 18-year-old when he arrived. He still is. He isn’t ‘failed’ in any way. Todibo looks good, Soler looks good, Rodriguez, who looks nondescript, joined because of Lopo. Summerville is very good, Wan-Bissaka is very good and Fullkrug, coming off a great two years, also for Germany, just got unlucky with injury. He may yet come good for us. The one very poor decision was Lopo: Sullivan’s decision. I’m just glad that Karren Brady finally got him to see sense. TS was, I suspect a Kretinsky appointment, and I think most of us can see he doing okay and can certainly play a helpful role in the Potter revolution. I don’t think much will happen this window, with the arrival of a striker the most likely option. I agree with your recent comment that the focus should be more on next summer.

    Like

    1. One thing we know for certain is not to trust anything that can be traced back to Sullivan as its source. There are a few online sites who have close ties to the Sullivans and are clearly useful outlets for the leaks and spin. Sadly, nothing is likley to change under the current regime. The strange thing about Guilherme is he appears not to be playing any football anywhere, other than in training. The typical Brighton route for this type of signing is to loan young players out to the Dutch or Belgium leagues. Guilherme has only made rare outings for the Development squad, I believe.

      Like

    2. Well written John, covers the situation very well. Fingers crossed for Potter and may our luck continue for a while anyway. Palace very interesting game, may tell us where we are going. I would hope we get at least a decent cf. Regards Michael

      Like

Comments are closed.