One Man, One Goal, One Mission: Is Ings The Key To Overturning Freiburg Deficit

West Ham have enough firepower to come through the Europa League tie with Freiburg. But winning games by more than one goal has not been a Moyes speciality.

West Ham’s last two games – defeat at Freiburg and the draw against Burnley – had the Moyesiah’s cautious fingerprints all over them. The brief barnstorming opening against Brentford now just a rounding error in the history of the season. A season which any sane West Ham supporter would want to end with the manager’s final farewell.

A point I have laboured at length on these pages is that the problem with Moyes is not about results but with performances – the way he approaches game. The trip to Freiburg was the perfect example. An unspectacular, mid-table opponent who had been beaten twice in the group stage and the overriding priority was to avoid defeat. This wasn’t a first leg away at the Nou Camp. And even after going a goal down, the response was to bring on another defensive midfielder. Never mind looking for an equaliser, let’s make sure we don’t concede again. The master tactician’s only attacking change was to introduce Michail Antonio in the 91st minute.

Anyone baffled by events in Germany would have been close to a breakdown when the teams were announced for Sunday’s league game. The cunning plan for what should have been a routine win against basement dwelling opposition was to set up with a bank of three slow defensive midfielders. Who could have guessed that it would allow Burnley to give us a footballing lesson in the opening 45 minutes. The resting of Edson Alvarez given his yellow card position was understandable but what was in the manager’s mind.

The half-time changes needed were obvious and completely changed the urgency on the pitch and the atmosphere in the stadium. And the later introduction of Danny Ings almost won it for the Hammers. It is fair to say that Ings time at West Ham has been disastrous in the role that he has been asked to play. And after putting in a good performance at Sheffield United he was immediately sidelined and rarely seen again. You’re either one of Moyes boys or you’re not.

From the body language at the break, I had a sneaking feeling that it was John Heitinga’s work behind the early substitutions. It just seemed too revolutionary for Moyes who was slumped in his seat.

There is an amusing moment on the TV commentary where Tony Gale was asked by the commentator if the West Ham fans were justified in wanting Moyes out. You could sense him squirming and sweating like a small-time villain under oath in the witness box as he ummed, ahhed and waffled in search of a diplomatic answer. Finally admitting that with the players available it might be possible to take more risks.

Each of the recent games involved the now customary VAR talking points. Both potential handball penalty appeals that were not awarded to West Ham. It is extremely rare to see a referee go across to the pitch-side monitor and then stick with his original decision in the Freiburg game, but no surprise it happened in a Hammer’s game. With the Burnley incident I’m convinced VAR are under orders not to spend any time looking at incidents so close to the final whistle, especially where the ball is still in play.

I don’t have any sense that VAR is getting better with age and experience. Trying to think back to the golden pre-technology days, I don’t recall many being up in arms because a striker’s shoulder blade was offside or that the ball had brushed someone’s knuckle immediately before a goal was scored. The pain points (as I remember them) were around penalty calls (inside or outside the box) and the more obvious offside decisions that had been missed. The authorities have made up a whole new set of rules as an excuse to use the technology. As a believer in the adage that the best referee is the one you don’t notice, I can’t help thinking that VAR has gone to their heads – believing they are part and parcel of the entertainment. It won’t be long before Howard Webb appears in the stands at big games to reveal VAR decisions with a Caeser like thumbs-up/ thumbs-down signal.

It is blatantly obvious that the team to face Freiburg in the second leg needs to be similar to the one that started the second half against Burnley. Lukasz Fabianski in goal perhaps, Jarrod Bowen back out on the right, Lucas Paqueta in the middle behind the striker and Mohammed Kudus on the left. The dilemma is whether to start with Ings or Antonio in the striker role. With Freiburg likely to be sitting back the predatory skills of Ings might be preferably, as long as he is not left isolated. I am sure we will see them both at some point of the evening. I’ve a feeling Ings will be the evening’s unlikely hero, assuming Moyes makes the correct call.

The unfortunate Kudus draws the short straw in this lineup as the person picked to play out of position. The left-wing berth preventing him from cutting inside and shoot on goal.

It is difficult to see any circumstances where it is a good idea for Tomas Soucek and JWP to start in the same midfield. Although both have specific skills their overall contribution in open play is poor. Perhaps a team can carry one, but not both.

Picking the defensive lineup is also problematical on current form and injuries. If Emerson is out injured the only alternative seems to be Aaron Creswell who too easily loses concentration these days. In the centre, Zouma is crocked, Aguerd has lost all confidence, and Oggy has mysteriously disappeared – after two clean sheet appearances against Arsenal and Brighton he has played just one minute of football. Personally, I would opt for Oggy and Dinos in the following line-up:

Fabianski, Coufal, Mavropanos, Ogbonna, Cresswell, Alvarez, Soucek, Bowen, Paqueta, Kudus, Ings

If Moyes team-sheet doesn’t reflect this, he should be given his bus fare and sent home before kick-off.

Occasionally, there are fleeting thoughts entering my head that it wouldn’t be so bad if we lost this one. Not if it means getting rid of the manager.  But once the game starts, I only want victory, no matter what. The reality is that the Europa League is all that’s left of the season and hope has to be kept alive for as long as possible. I’m confident we can beat Freiburg but winning games by more than one goal has not been a core competency in recent times. Let’s make it an exception tonight and, please, try to get it done without extra time and penalties. COYI!

10 thoughts on “One Man, One Goal, One Mission: Is Ings The Key To Overturning Freiburg Deficit”

  1. That sums up Ings, ONE GOAL! and how much have we been paying him all season, whoever agreed so such a salary I just can’t understand. Ings should have gone last Summer, or latest in January! Except for bad recruitment! Must GO AT THE END OF THE SEASON!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hi Jeff,  can I pay his bus fare please??  Now or anytime.   If I was one of about 30,000 he would get a ‘clear off’ bonus as well. A rapidly deflating (again) Michael Batchelor 

    Sent from my iPhone

    <

    div dir=”ltr”>

    <

    blockquote type=”cite”>

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Great article Geoff. Most of us want the team to win and the manager to leave. Just as we did for most of 2003-04. This saga seems to have run forever, as attacking players come and go, then recover elsewhere. I hope Ings starts – he deserves the chance after the display against Burnley. And Paqueta has to play in the middle to supply him, not as spectator on the wing…COYI!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. p.s. apparently we have a player called Nathan Ayguard – see Moyes press conference on West Ham West Ham website. Looks like he’s lost DM’s respect…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Moyes says the strangest things. I read that he said Ings doesn’t get picked too often because he is only any use when the ball is in the box. Which seems the whole point of a striker to me. If we don’t make enough penalty area entries it is down to his tactics. He could say the same about Haaland.

      The centre-back position is a worry. Nathan plays like he has lost all confidence – his own and the managers.

      Like

  5. Ings has been around forever. DM must surely have known he is a fox in the box type striker, and that’s it. Apart from the bizarre tactics and pointless substitutions it’s the inappropriate recruitment (pre-Steidten) that has been so odd. Ings seemed the last player DM would want, and he’s on a huge salary. No wonder DM gives press conferences as if he’s been watching the team on a TV set from Mars.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. There’s more life on Mars than on the pitch most of the time. It’s the impression that what happens on the field has nothing to do with him that gets me. Still, let’s hope for a convincing win tonight

      Like

  6. Shame about the Alvarez card, but he’ll be back for the home tie on the 18th. Last night and the second half against Burnley showed what is possible. Surprise of the night for me was Antonio! I think we all knew Kudus is capable of beating half a team and scoring… 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, an unnecessary time to pick up a yellow card. Will need to get Phillips prepared and ready for the first leg at Leverkusen. I think continental teams struggle to handle a player like Antonio when he is up for it

      Like

Comments are closed.