In our next two games we go from one extreme to the other. On Sunday we visit champions elect Liverpool for what is traditionally our annual Premier League beating on Merseyside. I hate sounding defeatist, I’d love to believe otherwise but it is hard to think that we are going to go up there and surprise them. I know that they lost at Fulham last week but sadly the Cottagers were a much tougher proposition than facing West Ham at the moment, and you cannot believe that with our current form the three points, or even one, are there for the taking.
Then the following Saturday we go to the following extreme when entertaining (?) Southampton at the London Stadium. Surely, even in our current transitional mode three points is a certainty? Well I say that but 67 years of following the Hammers tells me otherwise. No guarantees of a win even against one of the poorest sides that the Premier League has seen.
Geoff’s article following the Bournemouth draw last Saturday says all I would want to say regarding the current state of affairs. I couldn’t add to that. Instead as I sat down to write this article my mind wandered and I got to thinking about the evolution of football in my time watching the game. I read an article about somebody from the 1960s coming back to life in the present day and the changes that they would encounter such as mobile phones, colour TV, internet and so much more, and thought about applying it to football.
When football fans reach a certain age, and I guess I have reached it, it is common to complain about how football has changed. “The beautiful game”, “a funny old game” or whatever you want to call it has undergone significant transformations over the decades since I first watched a game at Upton Park way back in 1958. As a youngster I thought it was a simple game, but it has evolved dramatically, especially in the 21st century. Football when I first knew it and football today are worlds apart in many ways, reflecting changes in tactics, technology, culture and the global nature of the game.
The football I remember from my youth was direct and more physical. The emphasis seemed to be on long balls and robust challenges. Teams at that time set up in a 2-3-5 formation, the players were numbered one to eleven, with each number relating to a specific position, 9 was centre forward, 11 outside left, 5 centre half etc. Players wore black boots, the kick-off had to travel forward, goal kicks had to clear the penalty area, almost all games kicked off at 3.00 on a Saturday or midweek games at 7.30 on a Wednesday. The referee didn’t draw any lines on the pitch to indicate ten yards, and players could back pass to a goalkeeper who could then pick it up.
Now boots are multi-coloured, the kick off always travels backwards, goal kicks can be small touches aimed at ball retention and building from the back. Referees now draw lines to indicate ten yards for free kicks in attacking areas but their accuracy at marking out the distance is sometimes questionable. Balls deliberately passed back to the keeper require modern keepers to demonstrate ball-playing skills that their predecessors didn’t have to. Some are better than others in this respect.
Years ago I don’t remember the term false nine at the time, or a number 41 playing as an eight or a 16 as a ten. I do remember Ron Greenwood studying continental football and introducing 4-2-4 to West Ham. Today, modern football is highly tactical, with variations in formation allowing for fluid transitions. There’s a greater focus on possession, pressing, and data-driven strategies.
In the 1960s training was less scientific, and fitness levels were varied. Some players had second jobs, Geoff Hurst for example played cricket for Essex in the summer alongside his main job as West Ham’s number 10. There was little focus on nutrition. Today footballers are generally elite athletes with access to advanced training methods, sports science and tailored diets.
Back in the day there was no VAR, no goal-line technology, no advanced analysis. Referees made decisions, often leading to controversy. Today technology plays a huge role from the tracking of player and team performance to VAR. And we still get controversy, VAR may have improved fairness (usually?) but at a cost where the natural flow of the game is disrupted. And we are also bombarded with statistics that may or may not be of interest too.
Back in the 1960s, time wasting was prevalent but less scrutinised than today. Goalkeepers could bounce the ball for some time before releasing it, players could pass back to them and they could pick it up and waste more time. In theory the modern game has introduced stricter enforcement against time wasting, with sometimes many minutes added to compensate for delays. However, despite these measures problems still persist. Substitutions in the final minutes or in added time remain tactics to disrupt the rhythm of the game.
And talking of substitutes they didn’t exist when I first watched the game. Players were known to return to the pitch with broken bones (even a broken neck in one famous instance) so that they had eleven on the field. Gradually that changed with one substitute allowed (for injury) and has gradually expanded so that now five are allowed with further additions for games with extra time or concussion injuries. How long before it becomes like rugby or American Football with “finishers” or “specialist teams”?
Social media did not exist in the 1960s whereas players today can be global influencers. Stadium safety has dramatically improved as a result of tragedies such as Hillsborough, Bradford etc which highlighted the need for stricter regulations. Modern stadiums are designed with advanced safety measures, including all seater stadiums and in theory better crowd control. However many still stand, especially behind the goals. But it is definitely safer.
Back in the sixties there was little football on TV – the cup final, England internationals and tournaments like the 1966 World Cup. Now of course, TV football is extensive. If you wish you can watch football almost non-stop day and night. The Champions League and other European competitions are a case in point. I remember the days when only the league champions gained entry into the European Cup, the cup winners entered the European Cup Winners Cup and perhaps a couple of others went into the Fairs Cup.
It has now changed to such an extent that we now have four English teams in the Champions League each season. Based on coefficient rankings that number will increase to five next season. And in the (unlikely perhaps) event of Aston Villa winning this season’s Champions League and finishing outside the top five in the Premier League then that will give English teams another spot taking it to six. Also, with Manchester United and Tottenham both languishing in the lower reaches of the league, but in the quarter finals of the Europa League, then if either of them win the competition that would be yet another team from England in next season’s Champions League bringing the total to seven!
The European competitions continue to expand. There has been a big rise in the number of games this season using the Swiss chess tournament method in the early stages. Never mind the quality feel the width is a phrase that is used to persuade us that quantity is more important than quality. Purely financial though isn’t it? Sometimes less is more. There’s a lot to be said for quality.
Football has evolved significantly since the 1960s, reflecting broader changes in society, technology and the global economy. The passion and essence of the game remain unchanged, its transformation has brought both opportunities and challenges. Football continues to evolve, sometimes for the better and sometimes not. I still believe that there is a lot that could be done to improve the game. Here are just some off the top of my head. You can probably think of others.
- A solution is needed to the nonsense that takes place at corner kicks and free kicks involving pushing, pulling and holding.
- The offside rule. Offside was designed over 100 years ago to eliminate goal hanging yet you can be offside anywhere in your opponents’ half. Why?
- Timing of games – why can’t we adopt the rugby method of timekeepers independent of the referee via a stadium clock which could be stopped upon signal from the referee.
- Unpunished time wasting.
- Improvements are needed to VAR
- Players surrounding the officials
I still enjoy watching good football, but I’m not sure that the enjoyment is what it was back in the 1960s / 1970s. In many ways modern football is perhaps better than old football. But my rose-tinted nostalgia for the game I watched back in my youth makes me lean towards those days. It’s probably just an age thing? Or is it?
Under The Hammers 