It’s A Perfect Time To Panic
Just when you think things can’t get any worse, West Ham manage to dig deeper to serve up an even more incompetent performance. New depths have been well and truly plumbed. This is not a team who just happen to be going through a poor fun of form, but one that doesn’t seem to know what it is supposed to be doing. We have a collage representing the worst aspects of manager’s past: Zola, Roeder, Grant and Bilic. The enigma of an under-performing team and a manager who, it appears, has absolutely no idea what has gone wrong or how to change things. Manuel Pellegrini admitted as much after the game. Ironically, most fans have a good idea where the deficiencies lie – pace, width, organisation, fitness, commitment and motivation – even if we wouldn’t really know how to fix them. But then again, we are not paid millions of pounds a year to do so. How quickly an opportunity to leap into third place has morphed into taking an unhealthy interest in the relegation placings. Two points from the last five (not particularly difficult) games has to be cause for concern. If Pellegrini can’t turn things around before Christmas, then someone else has to be handed the baton.
He Thought What?
One of the most perplexing reports that I read during the week was that Pellegrini’s believed that West Ham had played well against Sheffield United. True, we had a few chances to win the game but then so did the visitors. The consequence of that assessment was the naming an unchanged side for the game against Newcastle. A decision that set up a confrontation between the fastest winger in the league and the slowest full-back. Do we actually scout the strengths and weaknesses of the opposition? The modern game is very different now and if a player is not quick, athletic and full of running he needs to have some very special talents to compensate. Equally a manager needs organisation, tactical and motivational skills in addition to a smart CV. All of these things are in short supply at the London Stadium right now. When Pellegrini was appointed the one negative assessment that I read from his time at Manchester City was that he had allowed fitness levels to drop off alarmingly in his second season. Has the same now happened at West Ham? Has the manager lost the dressing room – after all the London Stadium is a big place and his short term memory is quite possibly starting to fail now!
You’ve got to hold and give but do it at the right time
You can be slow or fast but you must get to the line
They’ll always hit you and hurt you, defend and attack
There’s only one way to beat them, get round the back
Rapper John Barnes on West Ham’s Attacking Limitations
Can We Play You Every Week?
Running through West Ham’s limitation each week’s after the latest disappointment is becoming like a scratched record stuck on repeat. We must be the easiest team in the world to play against. Stay compact, get back into shape quickly and the Hammers will have no clue what to do. Then simply hit them on the break and get numbers forward quickly. The first inclination of any West Ham midfielder is a backwards or sideways shuffle that allows any opposition ample time to regroup behind the ball. I am sure our pass completion for pointless five yard passes is an amazing stat. In a well drilled side, players would know exactly what they are going to do before receiving the ball. That just isn’t happening. Playing the ball into space for a teammate to run into is now a blue moon event with West Ham. The team has become a band of flat-footed strollers, unable to create even the semblance of a chance in open play – irrespective of the amount of possession. Pellegrini has been talking of a reaction in next week’s game, but with Burnley also being soundly beaten at the weekend where would your money go as to who gets the biggest reaction?
It’s A Team Game
“Rarely, if ever, can a Premiership team have defended so poorly.”
“…. must take some of the blame for poor organisation and questionable selection. West Ham’s marking was shambolic at set pieces”
The above quotes were taken from a report when West Ham lost 4-3 at home to Leeds in November 2002 having been 4-1 down at half time – a match I remember well. A second half recovery partially disguised the incompetence of the first, just as with Saturday’s game. West Ham could easily have been on course by the break to challenge Southampton’s 9-0 home defeat record, had Newcastle been more clinical in front of goal. There is no doubt that Roberto is well below average for a keeper at Premier League level – a cost saving gamble that backfired due to Fabianski’s injury – but he was not the sole reason we lost the game. Capitulation was the only thing that the team did collectively all afternoon. The team had no idea how to deal with pace and movement of the visitor’s attacking players. There was a definite improvement in the latter stages of the second half, but it never turned into an onslaught – even in those five minutes of added time where an equaliser was a possibility. For most of the game the only attacking threat was Fabian Balbuena at corner kicks. Still no-one wanted to play anywhere near to Sebastien Haller. I agreed with much of Danny Gabbidon’s post match assessment. The problems are as much about system as personnel – but then I have though the same for a long time. Sure, better players would be great, but the core competence of a manager is to find a system that gets the best results with the resources available. This is just not happening and there is not even the slightest hint West Ham are attacking, defending or working together as a team. There is no direction, no ideas and no leadership.
Player Recruitment And The Academy
Having said that our problems are as much about system as personnel I do believe that the club’s recruitment policy is flawed – probably as a result of using agents rather than old-fashioned scouting to target recruits. Over the years there has been a procession of players who may be technically competent, but who lack the work ethic that a club like ours (in fact any club) needs these days to compete. Players who believe that a move to a Premier League club (and the bright lights of London) on lucrative contracts is the pinnacle of their ambition. Successful players need the right mix of talent and application – not one or the other. The West Ham academy has also failed to deliver consistently for many a long year. As fans we love to see youngsters coming through, but it is tempting to believe that successive managers have not given youth a chance. There haven’t been that many who have slipped through the net, only to build successful careers elsewhere – so why are we not developing youngsters with right attributes. I feel that there is some hope with the new academy guy, Dmitri Halajko, who has been doing a great job in charge of the U23’s. He seems to have the kind of progressive outlook that is sadly missing in the first team. It is quite unusual that a club doesn’t play the same style of football throughout all age groups – but maybe the youth coaches refuse to go shambolic.
Ratings: Roberto (4), Zabaleta (3), Diop (5), Balbuena (5), Cresswell (4), Rice (5), Noble (3), Yarmolenko (4), Snodgrass (6), Anderson (5), Haller (5) Subs: Lanzini (6), Ajeti (4), Fredericks (5)
4 thoughts on “Uh oh, we’re in trouble! Something’s come along, and it’s burst our bubble.”
Too many players purchased with no premier league experience. To then realise they can’t cut it. Big centre forwards do best with a partner. Slowing down heroes have to be rested, over the hill veterans need to be used only as back up.
Playing wingers on sides opposite to their dominant foot is just showboating and is a luxury only suitable for champions league. Against Burnley the side has to be toughened up, give Masuaku a run on the left, move Anderson into the middle to support and release Haller, Snodgrass on the right, Fredericks back, Ogbonna to return, rest the captain,(who with, I haven’t a clue, it should have been the box to box midfielder that needed buying in the summer but we know how that went)
As for the keeper, to axe now and then find out his replacement is as fragile will have two keepers whose confidence and nerves are shot to pieces, this will knock on to the defence, as shown against Newcastle.
A manager, so stuck on Central American players that any youth is ignored no matter how well they are performing at U-23level. Post match reports identify the opposing managers have Pelle in their pockets tactics wise, this won’t change unless he starts to change it himself.
All in all, is this better than the previous two managers? At least they were a darn sight cheaper!
LikeLiked by 1 person
All good points and ideas worth trying. The weird thing is the manager has no appetite for trying something different. As if somehow things that haven’t worked in the past will suddenly come good
Great comments. You’ve nailed some major problems. Sorry to be ageist (and I’m 66) the Premiership is now a younger manager’s game. Our management looks tired and out of ideas. There is no excuse for dropping Fredericks and Ogbonna when they were going so well. Masuaku the same – great overlap and cross for Haller against Norwich. What does that do for team spirit ?… Where was the sense in buying Fornals and releasing Fernandes?! It would have been great to see him develop further with Rice. Instead we have Sanchez who is too slow and overweight. By contrast Anderson was first man back to cover the line for Roberto when he foiled a couple of rapid counter-attacks. There’s hope yet. Imagine what he could do playing in central midfield…
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s how I see it. There needs to be fresh ideas. We are just so predictable otherwise. Seems that we are from the same vintage.
Comments are closed.